Talk:Ifd:IfdConceptInRelationship

Comments: Does this Concept has a different ID with respect to a separate Concept? That would be very confusing, unless it would be the ID of the Relationship, but then this thing could better be an IfdRelationship.

I suggest to replace the context parameter with the IfdPropertyTypeEnum, to distinguish between defining Relationships and Specifying relationships. I suggested to use the additional 'owner' attribute to allow selection on libraries. --Kees Woestenenk

A quick note: This concept has the same guid as the "normal" concept. They are the same thing, but this comes with a little bit more information, or more specifically, is in the context of a specific relationship. --Håvard.Bell

Ede Workshop:
We should add an object for relationship. Implementers feel that getting rid of it complicates more than it simplifies. A relationship object could return some attributes for the relationship and a parent and child.

--Håvard.Bell