Ifd:removeIllustrationFromConcept

From dev.ifd-library.org

API version 2

public IfdConcept removeIllustrationFromConcept (
                              String concept_guid,
                              String illustration_guid,
                              String session_id )
       throws IfdServerException

EXPRESS heading:

removeIllustrationFromConcept(concept_guid: STRING; illustration : IfdIllustration) : IfdConcept;

Removes the illustration from the concept. This do not delete the illustration from the library, it just removes it from the concept.

Input:

• string concept_guid - The GUID of the we want to remove the illustration from.
• string illustration - The global unique identifier for illustration we want to remove from the concept.

• session_id - The session id for the active user

Returns:

• IfdConcept - The concept after the illustration has been removed.

API version 3

public IfdConcept removeIllustrationFromConcept (
                              String session_id,
                              String concept_guid,
                              String illustration_guid)
       throws IfdServerException

EXPRESS Heading

QUERY FUNCTION removeIllustrationFromConcept(
                     concept_guid,
                     illustration_guid : STRING): IfdConcept;

The function removes an illustration from concept specifications in target IFD population.

Input:

• session_id - The session id for the active user
• string concept_guid - global unique id of the concept to remove specified illustration;
• string illustration - global unique id of the illustration to be removed from the concept

Returns:

• IfdConcept - Fully specified in all available languages target concept with removed illustration (attributes description see getConcept).

Difference against v.2.00

• (123) In v.2.00 the function did not check user rights;
• (124) In v.2.00 the function did not provide correct exception/transaction handling;
• (125) In v.2.00 the function did not check if the removed illustration is used in preference relationship, that could leave IFD population invalid

Back to the API

Comments: